|

|

|

|

|

|

Partners

227 competitions documented	466 competitions listed
6 009 projects	60 929 documents

Advanced Search

MODELS + VIDEOS

PUBLICATIONS + OPEN ACCESS

Competitor

civiliti + LAND Italia + FNX

Finalist

Aménagement du terrain nº 066 et de ses abords / Development of Lot No. 066 and Its Surroundings

Stage 1

Stage 2

Presentation Panel

01

Perspective

01

Perspective

02

Plan

01 Sector

Plan

02 Installation

Section

01 AA

Section

02 BB

Axonometric Drawing

01 Winter Occupancy

Axonometric Drawing

02 4 seasons space

Schema

01 Winter occupancy during the day

Schema

02 Topography and softscare

Schema

03 Winter evening occupancy

Schema

04 Space 4 season by day

Schema

05 Connectivity

Schema

06 Mobility

Schema

07 Marketability

Schema

08 Evening 4-season space

Drawing

01 Suspended walkway and fogging nozzles

Drawing

02 Structure on stilts

Drawing

03 Net connection

Drawing

04 Fogging nozzle

Reference Image

01 Field

Reference Image

02 Forest

Reference Image

Reference Image

04 Flooding area

GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE COMPETITOR

Competitor	civiliti
	www.civiliti.com/

	LAND Italia Srl
	www.landsrl.com

	FNX-Innov
	fnx-innov.com


Distinction	Finalist
Doc. level	75%

Description

Nature en spectacle proposes a landscape, a landscape experience, and the urban landscape as a celebration; it is a green lung in the heart of the Quartier des spectacles and a place of climatic comfort; it is a playful meeting place on the bangs of existing developments and programmed animation.
Re-imagining the Promenade des artistes
- the North collar of Place des Arts
The development of lot 066 is first of all an opportunity to reflect on the monolithic identity of the Quartier des spectacles and to rethink the Promenade des Artistes. It is an opportunity to introduce a new landscape, and to affirm the place of nature in the city and of a qualified biodiversity all along the northern collar of Place des Arts. It is an opportunity to deconstruct the strong minerality of the existing landscaping and redevelop some of the barren patches of lawn. We believe that the borough and the Quartier des spectacles must make room for nature - that nature must be put on show - and that the city must favour strategies for urban comfort and the ecological services that the introduction of new plant density brings.
The context plan outlines a renewed vision for the North Collar, including the permanent closure of de Maisonneuve Boulevard and the re-routing of traffic onto President Kennedy. To encourage the deployment of festivals, the bicycle path is also diverted along the same axis, south of the existing tree line, transformed into linear ditches and rain gardens.

Structure of the footbridge
The bridge is conceived as a refined and memorable design object. Its design aims at an economy of means and materials for an optimal structural performance. A framework of steel columns on screwed piles supports two curved tubulars that wind under the organic form of the footbridge. The location is strategically north of the subway tunnel. Cross beams support a grating made of FRP (Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic), a composite material with structural properties comparable to metals. This inert material and the steel allow the application of the distinctive yellow color. A 2.0 meter wide strip of stained wood is interspersed along the axis of the walkway. This central and continuous surface offers the warmth of a natural material and a universally accessible surface for travel. Attached to secondary tubulars, two large woven nylon nets extend on either side of the walkway.

(From competitor's text)

(Unofficial automated translation)

Jury Report

Evolution of the Proposal in terms of approach, concept and proposed amenities
The jurors found the performance to be quite convincing. Its main strength lies in the sensitivity of the concept and the enhancement of the vegetation. The jury emphasizes the quality of the immersive experience in the vegetated area, which is greatly improved in the second stage.

Choice and relevance of spatial and formal choices
The jury underlines the relevance of the tools deployed in order to bring the user closer to nature and to make him experience it in a different way. Among other things, they appreciate the playful idea of lying down in the nets and looking at the sky, or sitting down, taking one's time and experiencing the site from the footbridge for long periods. The jurors also appreciate the fact that the footbridge is not too high, that the user can see under his feet the nature and have a real proximity with it. The choice of positioning the walkway close to the ground allows both to provide an enveloping effect of the canopy, but also to create a privileged contact with the low vegetation. The proposal focuses on a fine and sensitive composition on a human scale, allowing for interesting and diversified experiences.
However, the jurors have reservations about the logistical space located at the southeast exit of the bridge. This functional and technical space risks blocking access to the structure. The jurors also questioned the simplicity and the rather minimalist aspect of the proposal. They mention that despite a clear intention, the concept does not seem completely accomplished.

Choice and relevance of furniture, materials, plants, lighting
The jurors mentioned that some elements could have had a stronger and more detailed signature. For example, the corten borders remain very timid, or the details of the different materials of the walkway. The universal access does not seem to be respected considering the different textures and the delimitation of the passage and the net seems dangerous. The wooden section worries the jurors about the possibility of it becoming slippery in winter. All of these very real and unresolved issues did not convince the jurors.
The scale of the project was also discussed. The jurors consider that the development proposal is intimist and seems to address more the citizens of the neighborhood than the tourists and users of the Quartier des spectacles. This imbalance in the project does not fully meet the needs stated in the competition program. The jury would have liked to see a better integration of the proposal in its context. The proposed uses are not completely compatible with those of a project located downtown. Considering the location of the project and the very mixed population that will use the site, the nets of the footbridge may become an important issue: Will the physical limits of the footbridge be respected?

Reflection on the maintenance of the site and the sustainability of the facilities
In this regard, jurors note the existence of alternative paths to the walkway. There are no fences blocking access to the vegetated area, which could put a lot of pressure on the plants. The main challenge for the greening of this project is to design environments that can live in an urban context and withstand heavy traffic.

Technical feasibility of the project, including costs of development and implementation
The jury had concerns about certain aspects of the project in terms of its sustainability and its evolution over time. The jury wondered how the project would evolve with the crowd dynamics and intensity of the Quartier des spectacles.

Respecting the timelines and constraints of the site
The retention basin above the STM infrastructures creates significant problems that are not desirable.

(From jury report)

(Unofficial automated translation)

List of accessible documents

64 scanned / 64 viewable

IMPORTANT NOTICE : Unless otherwise indicated, photographs of buildings and projects are from professional or institutional archives. All reproduction is prohibited unless authorized by the architects, designers, office managers, consortiums or archives centers concerned. The researchers of the Canada Research Chair in Architecture, Competitions and Mediations of Excellence are not held responsible for any omissions or inaccuracies, but appreciate all comments and pertinent information that will permit necessary modifications during future updates.
info@ccc.umontreal.ca

Production

Partners