The switch is the railway mechanism that enables trains to be safely managed when changing tracks. It is the responsibility of a controller, located in a tower or signal box. With this reference to the safe movement of several trains, our Aiguillage urbain proposal recalls the railway history of Promenade Luc-Larivée, supports the original concept of Place Simon-Valois and metaphorically describes a meeting zone: a place at the crossroads of different urban movements and displacements, where safety is at the heart of the design. Indeed, like a mechanical switch between rails, every component of the layout is designed to facilitate mobility and the sharing of space in a safe environment: sharing and marking of active and passive travel corridors, support for the commercial environment of Ontario Street, and guidance for the mobility-impaired.
(From competitor's text)
(Unofficial automated translation)
Design challenge: The design proposal is perceived as simple, robust, durable and capable of enhancing the character of the site. It succeeds brilliantly in reinventing the street by proposing an open, minimalist space.
Functionality challenge: The concept allows the traditional street to be erased, while retaining good guides for the functionality of movement and shared space in terms of universal accessibility. The jury emphasized the effectiveness and relevance of the overall geometry.
Cohesion challenge: The design is coherent with that of Place Simon-Valois, and uses a common language to extend it beyond its physical limits.
Aesthetics and visual challenge: The jury perceives the proposed interventions as visually interesting.
Appropriation and versatility challenge: The proposed tree grid on Ontario Street offers strong potential for appropriation in a variety of scenarios and moods. The jury appreciates the distinction between the treatment of Ontario Street and Valois Avenue (e.g., the lounges).
Evolution of the proposal: The jury is satisfied with the evolution of the proposal. It notes a significant improvement in several areas. Appropriateness and effectiveness of the spatial, formal, material and technical choices: The jury emphasized the appropriateness and effectiveness of the spatial, formal, material and technical choices. The jury is convinced of the functionality of the shared space, the appropriateness of the use of corten and the identity-building impact of the selected lighting fixtures.
Feasibility and cost compliance: The jury considers that the feasibility of the proposal has been demonstrated, and that the team appears to be highly qualified to carry it out.
(From jury report)
(Unofficial automated translation)
39 scanned / 39 viewable
- Presentation Panel
- Presentation Panel
- Perspective
- Presentation Panel
- Perspective
- Perspective
- Site Plan
- Perspective
- Section
- Section
- Perspective
- Schema
- Perspective
- Schema
- Site Plan
- Drawing
- Plan
- Drawing
- Plan
- Drawing
- Section
- Drawing
- Section
- Drawing
- Construction detail
- Construction detail
- Construction detail
- Schema
- Schema
- Schema
- Drawing
- Drawing
- Drawing
- Drawing
- Drawing
- Reference Image
- Reference Image
- Reference Image
- Reference Image
